Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 23;48(5):1104–1114. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac022

Table 3.

DFAR scores’ prediction by case/control status

Model Case/control status
B SE 95% CI P value
DFAR totala −3.2 0.6 −4.3 to −2.1 <.001
DFAR totalb −1.5 0.6 −2.7 to −0.3 .013
DFAR neutrala −2.9 0.9 −4.6 to −1.2 .001
DFAR neutralb −0.6 0.9 −2.4 to 1.2 .506
DFAR happya −0.9 0.6 −2.2 to 0.4 .160
DFAR happyb 0.3 0.7 −1 to 1.7 .639
DFAR feara −5.1 0.9 −6.9 to −3.1 <.001
DFAR fearb −3.3 1.1 −5.3 to −1.2 .002
DFAR angera −3.9 1 −5.9 to −1.9 <.001
DFAR angerb −2.3 1.1 −4.6 to −0.1 .041

Note: DFAR, degraded facial affect recognition.

aAdjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, BFRT score.

bAdjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, BFRT score, IQ. Models were random-intercept models that included one random effect to allow DFAR scores to vary across countries.