Skip to main content
editorial
. 2022 Sep 1;11(4):1457–1473. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00401-4

Table 1.

Responses to the pre-meeting survey

Responses (%)
Strongly agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly disagree
Unmet needs in RRMS 23 63 10 3 0
 There is still an unmet medical need in the treatment of RRMS 40 60 0 0 0
 Some of the most effective medications that suppress disease activity also have severe safety and tolerability issues 10 90 0 0 0
 Complexity and side effect profile of current treatment options result in poor treatment adherence 20 40 30 10 0
Early treatment of RRMS 65 27.5 7.5 0 0
 The regenerative potential of the brain is limited and becomes less effective with age 50 30 20 0 0
 Early treatment in RRMS is important for better long-term disease outcomes 80 20 0 0 0
 Earlier intervention with highly effective DMTs results in better long-term disease control 60 40 0 0 0
 “Time is Brain”: MS damages the whole brain, and damage begins from the start of the disease 70 20 10 0 0
Selective B cell targeting 25 65 10 0 0
 B cells are an appropriate target for a long-term treatment strategy in patients with RRMS 30 60 10 0 0
 Selective targeting of B cells is a long-term treatment strategy 30 60 10 0 0
 With B cell therapy, low rates of infection in clinical trials support the hypothesis of preserved immune surveillance 10 80 10 0 0
 B cells are drivers of MS pathogenesis 30 60 10 0 0
I involve my patients’ preference when it comes to making treatment decisions 60 40 0 0 0

Text in bold indicates main survey topics and the mean overall levels of agreement for each topic

DMT disease-modifying treatment, MS multiple sclerosis, RRMS relapsing–remitting MS