Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;22:219. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01133-0

Table 3.

Bivariate logistic analyses of association between socio-demographic characteristics and non-adherence among patients with T2DM

Variables Non-adherence Odd ratios, 95% CI P-value
N % OR Lower upper
Age
 18–30 years 3 2.8 1 0.32
 31–50 years 40 37.38 2.71 0.670 11.01 0.16
 More than 50 years 64 59.81 0.9 0.499 1.63 0.73
Sex
 Male 47 43.93 1 0.032*
 Female 60 56.07 1.85 1.05 3.24
Marital Status
 Single 9 8.41 1 0.26
 Married/cohabiting 81 75.70 2.02 0.682 6.01 0.204
 Divorce 17 15.89 0.96 0.44 2.1 0.917
Duration with diabetes and medications
 1-3 years 49 45.79 1 0.031*
 4-10yrs 26 24.3 2.18 1.09 4.34 0.027*
 More than 10 years 32 29.91 1.03 0.43 2.42 0.954
Education
 No formal education 17 15.89 1 0.036*
 Primary 51 47.66 2.87 1.27 6.5 0.012*
 Secondary 39 36.45 1.834 0.94 3.58 0.075
Employment status
 Jobless 28 26.17 1 0.008**
 Public employee 28 26.17 2.36 1.24 4.48 0.009*
 Private 51 47.66 0.8 0.38 1.72 0.57
Religion
 Christian 83 77.57 1 0.482
 Muslim 21 19.63 0.477 0.11 2.07 0.323
 Other 3 2.80 0.629 0.13 2.97 0.557
Residence
 Kigali 76 71.03 1 0.021*
 Out of Kigali 31 28.97 2.3 1.14 4.660
DPCS
 Good communication 37 34.58 0.003**
 Poor communication 70 65.42 2.4 1.36 4.25
Attitudes of the family members towards patients with T2DM
 Very concerned 46 42.99 1 0.005*
 Not concerned 37 34.58 0.5 021 12 0.23
 Perceived as burdensome 24 22.43 4.8 1.2 19.8 0.032*
Monthly income
  < 100,000rwf 56 52.34 1 0.89
 100,001–200,000rwf 36 33.64 1.19 0.5 2.84 0.69
  > 200,000rwf 15 14.02 1.25 0.5 3.11 0.63

N Indicates number of cases or frequency, % Percentage, OR Odds ratio, CI Confidence Intervals

*p < 0.05

**p < 0.01

***p < 0.001