Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 28;24(8):1291–1299. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac034

Table 3.

Between groups differences of changes in clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of the TR evolution groups

Overall study population (n = 852) Baseline Grade 0–1 TR unchanged (n = 583) Baseline Grade 2–4 TR improved (n = 75) Baseline Grade 0–1 TR worsened (n = 85) Baseline Grade 2–4 TR unchanged (n = 109) P-value
≥1 class improvement in NYHA class (%) 472 (55.4%) 325 (55.7%) 50 (66.7%) 44 (51.8%) 53 (48.6%) 0.095
Absolute change in 6MWT (m) 57.9 (±87.5) 57.4 (±82.3) 90.0 (±90.4) 52.4 (±99.5) 43.6 (±100.9) 0.033
Absolute change in QOL score −8.8 (±17.1) −9.0 (±16.6) −15.0 (±15.9) −5.0 (±19.1) −6.0 (±18.5) 0.005
Relative change in RVEDA (%) 5.8 (±24.4) 5.2 (±23.2) −2.1 (±29.5) 15.7 (±25.6)*, 7.6 (±23.6) <0.001
Relative change in RVESA (%) 9.3 (±31.8) 9.7 (±30.4) −6.0 (±33.0)* 23.3 (±39.2)*, 8.1 (±27.7),# <0.001
Absolute change in FAC (%) −0.8 (±12.7) −1.4 (±12.1) 3.6 (±14.3)* −2.3 (±14.9) 0.26 (±12.5) 0.010
Relative change in LVEDV (%) −8.2 (±21.2) −10.7 (±20.0) −5.5 (±24.9) 1.5 (±22.9)*, −2.2 (±20.3)* <0.001
Relative change in LVESV (%) −15.0 (±24.7) −18.2 (±22.7) −16.0 (±27.2) −1.1 (±30.9)*, −7.8 (±22.5) <0.001
Absolute change in LVEF (%) 6.1 (±8.9) 6.7 (±8.9) 6.7 (±9.0) 3.2 (±9.8)* 4.7 (±8.0)* 0.003

EDA, end-diastolic area; EDV, end-diastolic volume; EF, ejection fraction; ESA, end-systolic area; ESV, end-systolic volume; FAC, fractional area change; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; LV, left ventricular; MWT, minute walking test; QoL, quality of life; RV, right ventricular.

*

P < 0.05 vs. baseline Grade 0–1 TR unchanged.

P < 0.05 vs. baseline Grade 2–4 TR improved.

#

P < 0.05 vs. baseline Grade 0–1 TR worsened.