Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 28;84(2):613–626. doi: 10.1007/s00248-021-01869-7

Table 4.

Overall coinfection rates in I. ricinus ticks according to the geographic areas of origin and to the tick-borne bacteria involved

Country % Coinfection [95%CI] Type of coinfection (%) [95%CI]
B – Bm B – M B – R Bm – M Bm – R M—R
Belgium 75.6 [73.7–77.5] 0.7 [0.4–1.3] 20.7 [18.6–22.9] 22.1 [20.0–24.3] 1.9 [1.2–2.7] 1.9 [1.3–2.8] 94.1 [92.8–95.3]
UK 42.8 [35.3–50.5] 0 [0–1.0] 13.5 [6.7–23.5] 14.9 [7.7–25.0] 0 [0–1.0] 0 [0–1.0] 87.8 [78.2–94.3]
Germany 7.4 [0.9–24.3] 0 [0–1.0] 100 [15.8–100] 0 [0–1.0] 0 [0–1.0] 0 [0–1.0] 0 [0–1.0]
Italy 19.2 [16.7–21.7] 2.6 [0.9–6.0] 86.3 [80.6–90.9] 7.9 [4.5–12.7] 2.6 [0.9–6.0] 1.1 [0.1–3.8] 18.4 [13.2–24.7]
The Netherlands 15.3 [12.1–18.9] 2.8 [0.3–9.8] 15.5 [8.0–26.0] 59.2 [46.8–70.7] 4.2 [0.9–11.9] 11.3 [5.0–21.0] 31.0 [20.5–43.1]
Sweden 33.5 [26.6–41.0] 1.7 [0.04–9.1] 61.0 [47.4–73.5] 18.6 [9.7–30.9] 3.4 [0.4–11.7] 1.7 [0.04–9.1] 30.5 [19.2–43.9]

Note: B, Borrelia burgdorferi s.l.; Bm, Borrelia miyamotoi; M, Midichloria mitochondrii; R, Rickettsiella spp