Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 1;23:44. doi: 10.1186/s10195-022-00661-8

Table 2.

Comparison of the operated levels between FA (n = 101) and CTNav (n = 91) groups

FA group (n = 101) CTNav group (n = 91) p
Single-level surgery (%) 59 (58.4) 53 (58.2) 0.980
 L2–L3 (%) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.1)
 L3–L4 (%) 4 (4.0) 6 (6.6)
 L4–L5 (%) 38 (37.6) 38 (41.7)
 L5–S1 (%) 17 (16.8) 8 (8.8)
Two-level surgery (%) 35 (34.7) 33 (36.3) 0.815
 L2–L4 (%) 3 (3.0) 3 (3.3)
 L3–L5 (%) 20 (19.8) 17 (18.7)
 L4-S1 (%) 12 (11.9) 13 (14.3)
Three-level surgery (%) 7 (6.9) 5 (5.5) 0.681
 L2–L5 (%) 5 (4.9) 4 (4.4)
 L3–S1 (%) 2 (2.0) 1 (1.1)

Data are reported as counts (percentages). FA fluoroscopy assisted, CTNav CT-navigation assisted