Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 2;58(2):249–266. doi: 10.1007/s00127-022-02357-0

Table 11.

Association between alcohol use and employment status over a 3 years of follow-up by differentiating between frequency of use and dependence (n = 1427)

Being unemployed over 3 years of follow-up
Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Alcohol frequency of used
 [0–2] Ref Ref Ref
 [3–5] 0.82 0.59 1.12 0.87 0.63 1.21 0.84 0.60 1.17
 [6 +] 0.74 0.52 1.05 0.84 0.98 1.20 0.82 0.57 1.16
Alcohol dependencee
 [0] Ref Ref Ref
 [1–2] 1.24 0.91 1.69 1.21 0.89 1.64 1.18 0.86 1.60
 [3 +] 1.80 1.27 2.54 1.74 1.23 2.46 1.65 1.16 2.34
Years of follow-up 0.75 0.66 0.85 0.75 0.66 0.86 0.76 0.66 0.87
Age 1.10 1.03 1.17 1.08 1.01 1.15
Gender
 Men Ref Ref
 Women 0.96 0.73 1.25 0.87 0.66 1.13
Education levelf 0.60 0.49 0.74 0.63 0.52 0.78
Area deprivation indexg 0.99 0.92 1.07 0.99 0.92 1.07
Living place
 With parents Ref Ref
 Other 0.85 0.66 1.09 0.85 0.66 1.09
Depressive stateh
 No Ref
 Yes 2.11 1.58 2.83

aUnivariate analysis adjusted to years of follow-up

bAdjusted for sociodemographic factors

cAdjusted for sociodemographic factors and depressive state

dAUDIT sub-score for frequency of use by adding the scores of the first 3 items

eAUDIT sub-score for alcohol dependence by adding the score of items 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10

fBased on the International Standard Classification of Education

gRepresenting spatial socioeconomic disparities

hMeasured using the Center of Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CESD) and a score ≥ 19