Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 27;9:uhac143. doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac143

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Response of M. hupehensis to low N stress with and without TOR inhibition. (A, B) Phenotypes of M. hupehensis under low N stress. (C, D) Average fresh and dry weights of plants measured before and after stress treatments. (E) Contents of N in roots and leaves in each treatment. Data are mean ± standard error of 10 replicate samples. Different lowercase letters indicate statistically significant differences between treatments according to Tukey’s multiple range test (P < .05). NC, plants without any treatment; 0A, low N stress treatment (0.2 mM N); 0.5A–10A, low N stress with 0.5 μM (0.5A), 1 μM (1A), 2.5 μM (2.5A), 5 μM (5A), and 10 μM (10A) AZD8055 treatments.