Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e060183. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060183

Table 3.

Summary statistics of responders’ perceived likelihood of publication bias in comparisons of near optimal (<1 cm) and suboptimal (>1/2 cm) versus complete cytoreduction (0 cm)

RD <1 cm vs 0 cm RD >1 cm vs 0 cm RD >2 cm vs 0 cm
Summary statistics
(Scale 1–5)
Mean
(SD)
Median
(IQR)
Range Mean
(SD)
Median
(IQR)
Range Mean
(SD)
Median
(IQR)
Range
Overall score of perceived likelihood of
publication bias (n=18)
2.94 (1.1) 3 (2–3) 1–5 2 (1.3) 1 (1–3) 1–5 1.4 (1.1) 1 (1–1) 1–5
Total estimated missing studies (n) 17.8 (16.5) 10
(5–20)
0–50 8.6 (12.9) 5
(0–10)
0–50 6.2 (13.2) 0.5
(0–5)
0–50

RD, residual disease.