Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 2;17:336. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02469-5

Table 4.

Change from baseline in cardiovascular imaging endpoints*

TAZPOWER Patients (n = 12) Natural History Controls (n = 12)
Slope Model Analysis
LV stroke volume (mL)
Mean (SD) change from baseline; range 3.44 (5.26); − 1.7, 18.3  − 0.26 (2.66); − 4.9, 3.7
P value 0.0407
LV end-diastolic volume (mL)
Mean (SD) change from baseline; range 4.89 (7.25); − 1.5, 24.7 0.91 (6.15); − 12.3, 11.2
P value 0.1609
LV end-systolic volume (mL)
Mean (SD) change from baseline; range 1.46 (2.26); − 2.0, 6.4 1.17 (4.29); − 7.4, 9.1
P value 0.8417
Mixed Model Analysis
LV stroke volume (mL)
LS mean change from baseline 1.92 − 4.80
LS mean difference (95% CI), P value 6.72 (2.75, 10.69); P = 0.0020
LV end-diastolic volume (mL)
LS mean change from baseline 2.08 − 2.66
LS mean difference (95% CI), P value 4.75 (− 2.72, 12.22); P = 0.2006
LV end-systolic volume (mL)
LS mean change from baseline 0.52 1.28
LS mean difference (95% CI), P value  − 0.77 (− 7.13, 5.60); P = 0.8047

*Indexed to baseline body surface area

CI Confidence interval, LS Least squares, LV left ventricular, SD standard deviation