Table 4.
Correlation of cancellous BMDD and CaYoung with re-visited histomorphometric indices of bone formation in the T2DM study group.
| BFR/BS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MS/BS | MAR | BFR/BS | |
| Cn.CaMean | R=-0.52, p=0.006 | R= -0.42, p=0.03 | R= -0.52, p=0.007 |
| Cn.CaPeak | R= -0.46, p=0.02 | n.s. | R= -0.45, p=0.02 |
| Cn.CaWidth | R=0.64, p<0.001 | R=0.42, p=0.03 | R=0.65, p<0.001 |
| Cn.CaLow | R=0.56, p=0.003 | n.s. | R=0.56, p=0.003 |
| Cn.CaHigh | n.s. | R= -0.40, p=0.04 | n.s. |
| Cn.OLS-porosity | R=0.49, p<0.05 | R=0.54, p=0.004 | R=0.50, p=0.009 |
| Cn.OLS-density | R=0.39, p<0.05 | n.s. | n.s. |
| Cn.OLS-area | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Cn.OLS-perimeter | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Cn.OLS-aspect ratio | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
| Cn.CaYoung | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. |
Data are PPM or SRO correlation coefficients and corresponding p-values. n.s. = not significant.
Histomorphometric indices of bone formation are re-visited outcomes from our previous study[20].