TABLE 2. Barriers to adoption of national WHO-HEARTS hypertension control programs and potential solutions provided by health economic analysis.
Barrier |
Solution |
---|---|
Countries are unlikely to invest budget sufficient to deliver life-long services for a highly prevalent condition like hypertension absent a convincing investment case |
Health economic analysis can quantify value for money. |
It is hard for countries to finance hypertension control without fundamental improvements to universal access, including health care financing overall. Countries need to explore financing schemes that support a broad package of essential services, including for NCDs but also incentivize highest priority conditions like hypertension. |
Health economic modeling may reveal the balance between capitation and disease-specific incentives. |
Cost of antihypertensive medications is among the biggest barriers to countries adopting national hypertension control programs, and lack of transparency re drug pricing and variable pricing across countries. |
Quantifying cost-effectiveness and budget impact gives countries specific benchmark prices to work toward and may encourage regional or global pooled procurement. |
Team-based care is known to be effective compared with usual care, but the economic case for team-based care must be better established. For example, shifting tasks to lower salary healthcare worker cadres should save money; but costing of team-based care complex. |
Research is needed to determine what is more important, adding members to the team, or expanding the scope of practice for individual team members. |
Presence of a large private sector presence in some countries complicates the design, execution, and health economic evaluation of national hypertension control programs. |
Studies in country private sectors are needed, including studies of private sector financial incentives to monitor and retain chronic disease patients, like people living with hypertension. |
National health insurance programs may not cover a full package of essential, high-value health care services that includes hypertension screening and treatment. |
There is a need for comprehensive and inclusive health services evaluations, including costing and economic analysis of HEARTS hypertension control services in the context of integration with other primary care priority conditions. |
A compelling investment case is needed before countries will adopt and scale up the HEARTS hypertension control package must address the needs, incentives, and competing priorites of multiple in-country stakeholders. |
Need for regular, intensive engagement of local governments, medication and device manufacturers, health workers, patients and their families, and information system designers in the health economic evaluation process. |
Source: This list of barriers and solutions was generated from informal discussion among the authors of this special report.