Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 3;12:15042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19148-x

Table 2.

Hazard ratios for frailty status and all-cause mortality calculated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis.

n Event PY Event/1000 PY Model 1a Model 2b
Rate 95%CI HR 95%CI HR 95%CI
FSI × KCL
Non-frailty 5960 346 30,677 11.3 (10.2 to 12.5) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
Physical frailty 223 14 1146 12.2 (7.2 to 20.6) 1.05 (0.62 to 1.80) 0.99 (0.58 to 1.70)
Comprehensive frailty 2211 367 10,792 34.0 (30.7 to 37.7) 2.02 (1.74 to 2.36) 1.91 (1.63 to 2.23)
Combinations 1882 530 8368 63.3 (58.2 to 69.0) 3.16 (2.72 to 3.66) 2.85 (2.44 to 3.22)
Interaction
RERIc 28.4 (22.1 to 34.7) 1.08 (0.45 to 1.71) 0.95 (0.33 to 1.57)
RERI (%) 54.6 50.0 51.3
FSI
Non-frailty 8171 713 41,469 17.2 (16.0 to 18.5) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
Physical frailty 2105 544 9514 57.2 (52.6 to 62.2) 2.07 (1.84 to 2.34) 1.89 (1.67 to 2.13)
KCL
Non-frailty 6183 360 31,823 11.3 (10.2 to 12.5) 1.00 (Ref) 1.00 (Ref)
Comprehensive frailty 4093 897 19,161 46.8 (43.8 to 50.0) 2.51 (2.20 to 2.86) 2.30 (2.00 to 2.63)

CI confidence interval, FSI frailty screening index, HR hazard ratio, KCL kihon checklist, RERI relative excess risk due to interaction, PY person-years.

aModel 1: Adjusted for age, sex, and population density.

bModel 2: In addition to the factors listed in Model 1, adjusted for family structure, economic status, educational attainment, smoking status, alcohol consumption status, sleep time, medication use, and number of chronic diseases.

cWe estimated that p < 0.05 when the 95% CI of the RERI exceeded 0, and p ≥ 0.05 when the 95% CI of the RERI did not exceed 0.