Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 4;23:229. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02148-w

Table 5.

Multi-adjusted contributions of age to the severity of SAD among IOS-defined SAD subjects (n = 603) from total subjects

Outcomes for SAD markers Unstandardized β Standardized β 95% CI P value
CT
 LAA−950, % 0.64 0.07 − 0.07, 1.34 0.078
 LAA−856, % 6.12 0.21 4.13, 8.14  < 0.001
 RV, L 0.16 0.11 0.05, 0.26 0.003
 TLC, L − 0.17 − 0.11 − 0.28, − 0.07 0.001
IOS
 R5, Ka/L/s 0.01 0.04 − 0.01, 0.02 0.382
 R20, Ka/L/s − 0.00 − 0.01 − 0.01, 0.01 0.755
 R5–R20, Ka/L/s 0.01 0.07 − 0.00, 0.01 0.116
 X5, Ka/L/s − 0.02 − 0.16 − 0.03, − 0.01  < 0.001
 AX, Ka/L 0.18 0.12 0.06,0.30 0.004
 Fres, Hz 0.80 0.14 0.32,1.29 0.001
Postbronchodilator
 MMEF, %predicted − 6.17 − 0.22 − 8.20, − 4.13  < 0.001
 FEF50, %predicted − 7.01 − 0.22 − 9.31, − 4.72  < 0.001
 FEF75, %predicted − 4.02 − 0.15 − 6.20, − 1.84  < 0.001

All the models were adjusted for sex, BMI, smoking status, smoking index, educational level, asthma, tuberculosis, chronic bronchitis, annual household income, smokers living at home, parental history of respiratory disease, occupation exposure > 6 months, indoor exposure to biomass for cooking or heating. All the variables of age in these models indicate per 10 years increase. Definitions of abbreviations see Table 1