Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;15:2577–2586. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S373877

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Relationship between RF electrode size and pain relief achieved after RF (A) and longevity of the >50% of pain relief (B). (A) Initial (4–6 weeks) pain relief after tRFA vs CRFA based on probe gauge. Although there was a tendency for the larger diameter electrodes to improve chronic knee pain somewhat better from the baseline, there was no immediate significant difference in improvements of pain scores between patients receiving RFA when using various electrode diameters for ablation. (B) Long-term maintenance of pain relief after tRFA vs CRFA. There was a significant prolongation of >50% of pain relief when the larger diameter of tRFA electrodes and especially CRFA electrodes were used for the knee denervation. Notice that there were much fewer patients in 20 and 16 G electrode groups (n=14 and n=13, respectively).