Table 2.
Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models investigating the effects of cytokine modulation on the pharmacokinetics of CYP substrates
Study, year of publication | Study population and design (N of included patients) | Drug and dosage | Inflammatory conditions and biomarker levels | Mechanism | Pharmacokinetic effect | Pharmacodynamic effect | Clinical relevance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Machavaram et al., 2013 [21] | Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model: patients with rheumatoid arthritis (12) or requiring a bone marrow transplant (5) | Simvastatin 40 mg (probe for 3A4) and cyclosporine 1.5 mg/kg (3A4) |
Rheumatoid arthritis or bone marrow transplant Assessment of serum IL-6 levels |
Downregulation of CYP3A4 metabolism mediated by increase in IL-6 levels |
Elevated simvastatin AUC in virtual patients with rheumatoid arthritis, following 100 pg/mL of IL-6 was comparable to observed clinical data (59% vs 58%) In virtual patients requiring a bone marrow transplant, 500 pg/ml of IL-6 resulted in increase in cyclosporine AUC that was in good agreement with the observed data (45% vs 39%) |
Not assessed | The application of physiologically based PK models is suitable for the prediction of drug–disease interactions via suppression of CYP by elevated levels of IL-6 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or requiring a bone marrow transplant |
Xu et al., 2015 [23] | Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model: virtual patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving blinatumomab | CYP probe drug cocktail: simvastatin (3A4), midazolam (3A4), theophylline (1A2), caffeine (1A2), warfarin (2C9) |
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Assessment of IL-6 and IL-10 serum levels |
Downregulation of CYP metabolism mediated by transient increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines due to blinatumomab administration |
Maximal suppression of transient IL-6 on CYP isoenzymes: 3A4: 28%, occurred at 48 h, lasted for 7 days 1A2: 9%, occurred at 48 h, lasted for 7 days 2C9: 17%, occurred at 70 h, lasted for 9 days Mean AUC (95% CI) ratio (transient IL-6 increase vs baseline) Simvastatin 1.9 (1.8–2.0) Midazolam 1.7 (1.6–1.8) Theophylline 1.1 (1.0–1.1) Caffeine 1.2 (1.1–1.3) Warfarin 1.2 (1.0–1.4) Mean Cmax (95% CI) ratio (transient IL-6 increase vs baseline) Simvastatin 1.7 (1.6–1.8) Midazolam 1.2 (1.1–1.3) Theophylline 1.0 (1.0–1.0) Caffeine 1.0 (1.0–1.1) Warfarin 1.0 (1.0–1.0) |
Not assessed | The magnitude of the suppressive effect of transient cytokine elevation on hepatic CYP enzyme activities is <30% for up to a week. Changes in exposures to substrates of CYP3A4, CYP1A2, and CYP2C9 are expected to be lower than two-fold and the magnitude of CYP suppression is highly dependent on the duration of cytokine elevation |
Machavaram et al., 2019 [22] | Physiologically based pharmacokinetic model: virtual patients with neuromyelitis optica or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in North European Caucasian, Japanese, or Chinese populations | CYP probe drug cocktail: caffeine 100 mg (1A2), warfarin 5 mg (2C9), omeprazole 20 mg (2C19), dextromethorphan 30 mg (2D6), midazolam 0.03 mg/kg (3A4), or simvastatin 40 mg (3A4) |
Neuromyelitis optica or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders Assessment of IL-6 serum levels according to a previous study performed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis |
Downregulation of CYP metabolism mediated by increase in IL-6 levels |
Mean fold change in AUC (steady-state IL-6 levels from 10 to 100 pg/mL): Simvastatin AUC ↑ 2.36-fold Midazolam AUC ↑ 2.08-fold Omeprazole AUC ↑ 1.97-fold Dextromethorphan AUC ↑ 1.37-fold Warfarin AUC ↑ 1.29-fold Caffeine AUC ↑ 1.07-fold |
Not assessed |
Increasing levels of IL-6 led to predicted increases in exposure to the CYP probe substrates tested, with the exception of caffeine (CYP1A2), being the CYP3A4 substrates the most sensitive to IL-6-mediated suppression There were no notable ethnic differences between the North European Caucasian, Japanese, and Chinese populations in the sensitivity of the change in pharmacokinetics of CYP probe substrates following IL-6-mediated suppression |
AUC area under concentration–time curve, C concentration, CI confidence interval, Cmax peak concentration, CYP cytochrome P450, IL interleukin, PK pharmacokinetic, ↑ increased