Skip to main content
. 2022 Mar 29;42(9):1666–1675. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221090997

Table 2.

Whole brain and regional volumes (mL).

Healthy controls (16) Fragile Xsubjects (10)
Whole brain 1433.9 ± 170.4 1337.4 ± 77.2
Frontal cortex 181.4 ± 19.0 165.1 ± 18.2*
Parietal cortex(Inferior parietal lobule) 29.5 ± 3.3 29.4 ± 4.0
Cingulate cortex 19.7 ± 2.8 18.2 ± 3.2
Hippocampus 8.2 ± 1.0 7.8 ± 1.4
Amygdala 1.3 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.2
Thalamus 14.5 ± 2.1 13.9 ± 2.1
Caudate 8.5 ± 1.5 9.3 ± 1.5
Putamen 8.8 ± 1.2 8.5 ± 0.8
Corona radiata (sampled volume) 5.5 ± 0.7 5.4 ± 0.7

Values are the means ± SD for the number of subjects indicated in parentheses.

Data from the regional analysis were subjected to a mixed model ANOVA with region as a within subject variable and diagnosis as a between subject variable. The region x diagnosis (F8,192 = 4.238, p = 0.042) interaction was statistically significant. *, Post-hoc Bonferroni-corrected multiple comparison results indicate that volume in frontal cortex was statistically significantly lower (−9%) in subjects with FXS. Whole brain volumes were analyzed separately by means of an unpaired t-test. Difference was not statistically significant (t = 1.676, df = 24, p = 0.107).