TABLE 4.
Results of hierarchal regression.
| Variable | Voice | Self-efficacy | Psychological safety | |||
|
|
|
|
||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |
| Control variables | ||||||
| Leaders’ age | –0.01 | –0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | –0.05 | –0.07 |
| Leaders’ gender | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.09 |
| Employees’ age | 0.22* | 0.21** | 0.09 | 0.07 | –0.00 | –0.02 |
| Employees’ gender | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.03 | –0.02 | –0.02 |
| Dyadic tenure | 0.04 | 0.04 | –0.04 | –0.02 | 0.02 | 0.06 |
| Independent variable | ||||||
| Leader humility (LH) | 0.15* | –0.05 | 0.41** | 0.31** | 0.60** | 0.35** |
| Mediator | ||||||
| Self-efficacy | 0.15** | |||||
| Psychological safety | 0.22** | |||||
| Moderator | ||||||
| Manipulative intention (MI) | –0.23** | –0.43** | ||||
| Interaction | ||||||
| LH × MI | –0.19** | –0.15** | ||||
| R 2 | 0.09 | 0.15** | 0.18** | 0.21** | 0.38** | 0.45** |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.