Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 15;12(8):3512–3531.

Table 3.

Studies on the omission of axillary lymph node dissection

Study Period Type Inclusion n Treatment of axillary Follow-up Results
NSABP B-04 [75] 1971-1974 prospective primary operable breast cancer 1765 1079 cN0 (1/3 ALND; 1/3 RT; 1/3 no surgery) 25 years NS in RFS, DFS, or OS
586 cN+ (1/2 RT; 1/2 ALND)
AMAROS [93] 2001-2010 prospective T1-2, cN0 4806 2402 ALND 6.1 years ALND vs RT:
2404 RT 5-year axillary recurrence
1425 cN+ 0.43% vs 1.19%
744 ALND; 681 RT DFS: 86.9% vs 82.7%
OS: 81.4% and 84.6%
ACOSOG Z0011 [94] 1999-2004 prospective T1-2, cN0; 891 446 SLND alone 9.3 years SLND vs ALND
N1-2 445 ALND OS: 86.3% vs 83.6%
DFS: 80.2% vs 78.2%
NS in LRR
Alliance A011202 2013- prospective T1-3, N1, M0 1660 ALND vs RT. - No results
NRG9353 2003- prospective T1-3, N1, M0 1636 ALND vs RT - No results

Abbreviations: OS, overall survival; DFS, disease-free survival; RFS, relapse-free survival; LRR, locoregional recurrence rate; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy; pCR, pathological complete response; cCR, clinical complete response; ALND, axillary lymph node dissection; SLND, sentinel lymph node biopsy; TAD, targeted axillary dissection; RT, radiotherapy treatment; NS, no significant.