Table 2. Quenching Ratios and Unstacked Populations for C(2-AP)Ca.
| buffer |
30% ethanol |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| smoothing | ε | Rϕ | % un | % fl un | Rϕ | % un | % fl un |
| none | 1 | 22 ± 4 | 5.9 ± 0.7 | 58 | 6 ± 1 | 11 ± 4 | 42 |
| 5 nm | 1 | 22 ± 1 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 59 | 5.7 ± 0.5 | 11 ± 2 | 42 |
| none | 2 | 23 ± 4 | 6.2 ± 0.6 | 61 | 6 ± 1 | 12 ± 3 | 48 |
| 5 nm | 2 | 23 ± 1 | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 61 | 6.2 ± 0.5 | 12 ± 1 | 47 |
Results are shown for models with and without smoothing by a 5 nm rolling average, and with (ε = 2) and without (ε = 1) accounting for hypochromicity of 2-AP in the stacked conformation. Rϕ = quenching ratio (ϕun/ϕst); % un = percent unstacked; % fl un = % of total fluorescence that comes from the unstacked population. Mean ± standard deviation of the results obtained at all data points in the range of 300–320 nm.