Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 5;23:844. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05783-y

Table 3.

Results from risk of bias assessment for RCTs (n = 13) and crossover studies (n = 3)

Author Random sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding of the participants Blinding of outcome assessment - self-reported outcomes Blinding of outcomes assessment - objective measures Incomplete outcome data Selective reporting Other bias
Hawk-2007 [158] + ? ? + + +
Hawk-2009-Pilot [159, 165] ? NA ? ? + N/A
Herzog-1991 [160] ? + +
Holt-2016 [114] + + ? + + + N/A
Kendall-2018 [63] + ? + + + + + +
Maiers − 2014 [161] + + + + + + ?
Maiers-2018 [27] + + + + ? ? ?
Malaya-2020 [171] + + N/A + + + +
Malaya-2021 [172] + ? N/A + + + +
Palgrem-2009 ? + N/A + + + N/A
Vining-2020 [46] + + + + + +
Ward-2013 [162] + N/A + + ?
Ward-2014 [133] + N/A ? + +

Bias assessment for the RCTs and crossover studies identified through the systematic search. Risk of bias assessment with 8 categories for each individual study