Skip to main content
letter
. 2022 Aug 29;18:1116–1122. doi: 10.3762/bjoc.18.114

Table 1.

Reaction optimization.

graphic file with name Beilstein_J_Org_Chem-18-1116-i001.jpg

Entry Variation from standard conditionsa % Yieldb

1 none 46
2 Pt (+) | C (–) instead of Pt (+) | Pt (–) ≪25c
3 C (+) | Pt (–) instead of Pt (+) | Pt (–) 40
4 DMSO as solventd <22
5 MeOH as solventd n.d.e
6 Bu4NCl instead of Bu4NBrd 35
7 Bu4NI instead of Bu4NBrd <21
8 Bu4NBF4 instead of Bu4NBrd 44
9 0.8 equiv Bu4NBr instead of 2.4 equiv Bu4NBrd 40
10 4.0 equiv Bu4NBr instead of 2.4 equiv Bu4NBrd 43
11 0 °C instead of rt 45
12 60 °C instead of rt <44
13 20 mA instead of 12 mA, 1.0 F/mol <33
14 6 mA instead of 12 mA, 1.0 F/mol 46
15 no electric current n.d.c,e

aStandard conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), 0.3 M Bu4NBr in DMF (4.0 mL × 2), divided cell, 12 mA, rt, 1.0 F/mol of electricity against 0.5 mmol of substrate 1. bIsolated yields using preparative GPC separation of the crude materials. cObserved from gas chromatography (GC) analysis. dIn both anodic and cathodic chambers. en.d. = no detection.