Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 19;72(3):295–301. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)30960-5

Table 4.

Results of acoustic voice analysis in patients undergoing CO2 laser cordectomy, considering the type of surgery and a comparison with the control group.

Patient Type Fund. freq. (Hz) male Fund. freq (Hz) female Jitter% Shimmer% Ratio harm/noise
1 I 191,72 1,59 3,34 0,13
2 I 120,27 0,99 4,55 0,14
3 I 205,25 1,61 1,97 0,10
4 II 172,68 3,09 3,12 0,09
5 II 143,47 1,49 2,36 0,13
6 II 140,06 2,15 4,43 0,16
7 II 161,89 2,62 3,09 0,13
8 II 124,85 8,04 12,72 0,47
9 III 281,75 2,82 3,26 0,09
10 III 119,77 3,25 5,05 0,13
11 III 158,04 1,24 5,48 0,13
12 III 174,40 4,24 11,74 0,29
13 IV 226,67 5,89 15,99 0,44
14 IV 112,00 20,85 24,59 0,78
15 IV 356,00 5,97 15,24 0,60
Average 167,51 226,24 3,18 7,79 0,25
Average Control 139,30(p=0,2008) 202,23 0,76(p=0,001) 3,95(p=0,0007) 0,13(p=0,053)