Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 22;13:813207. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.813207

Table 1.

Patients and arteriovenous malformation characteristics.

Case Age, y, sex Previous rupture Nidus size, cm AVM location S-M score Technique Venous collector mRs score on admission Postoperative mRs scores mRs final score Clinical outcome
1 36/F Yes 1.98 L, basal ganglia, Deep 3 TAE+TVE 1 2 2 0 Cure
2 10/F Yes 2.56 R, basal ganglia, Deep 3 TAE+TVE 1 2 3 2 Cure
3 17/F Yes 2.24 R, basal ganglia, Deep 3 TVE 1 2 2 2 Cure
4 47/F Yes 0.79 L, temporal lobe, Superficial 2 TAE+TVE 2 2 2 2 Cure