Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 27;35(3):ivac199. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac199

Table 1:

Hydrodynamic performance of investigated heart valves at various conditions

Native Ozaki PME TRI SJM
(n = 18) (n = 10) (n = 10) (n = 10) (n = 5)
EOA (cm2)
 Condition 1 1.33 (1.29–1.90) 1.41 (1.25–1.73) 1.28 (1.16–1.51) 1.19 (1.15–1.24) 1.27 (1.22–1.29)
 Condition 2 1.58 (1.51–2.11) 1.60 (1.43–1.94) 1.42 (1.29–1.51) 1.37 (1.32–1.41) 1.44 (1.42–1.44)
 Condition 3 1.70 (1.65–2.28) 1.70 (1.62–2.06) 1.49 (1.42–1.55) 1.49 (1.44–1.54) 1.59 (1.55–1.58)
 Condition 4 1.88 (1.76–2.32) 1.86 (1.78–2.14) 1.54 (1.53–1.58) 1.62 (1.59–1.68) 1.64 (1.63–1.68)
mPG (mmHg)
 Condition 1 6.47 (4.12–7.48) 6.36 (5.45–7.41) 8.03 (7.00–8.79) 8.26 (7.17–8.85) 6.91 (6.72–7.78)
 Condition 2 7.49 (4.85–8.20) 7.21 (5.90–8.16) 9.65 (8.29–10.40) 9.61 (8.58–10.30) 8.39 (7.53–8.91)
 Condition 3 8.26 (5.40–9.27) 8.16 (6.75–9.33) 10.83 (10.17–12.36) 10.37 (9.92–12.13) 9.12 (8.71–9.59)
 Condition 4 9.07 (7.05–10.55) 9.45 (7.57–10.36) 12.41 (11.36–13.88) 11.83 (11.45–13.28) 9.96 (9.24–10.26)

EOA: effective orifice area; mPG: mean pressure gradient; PME: Perimount Magna Ease; SJM: St. Jude Medical Masters HP; TRI: Trifecta.