Table 1.
Variate | SAS Score | P |
---|---|---|
Gender Male Female |
44.2 ± 12.5 42.0 ± 10.1 |
<0.001 |
Only child Yes No |
42.6 ± 11.8 42.8 ± 10.6 |
0.724 |
Poor student Yes No |
43.7 ± 10.9 42.4 ± 11.1 |
0.024 |
Scholarship Ever got None |
44.4 ± 12.6 42.5 ± 10.7 |
0.017 |
Academic performance Good Intermediate Poor |
41.7 ± 10.7 42.9 ± 10.7 43.9 ± 12.0 |
0.011 |
Origin of home Big city Middle city Small city Rural area |
45.4 ± 13.1 41.9 ± 11.1 42.1 ± 10.9 42.9 ± 10.4 |
0.002 |
Family economy Rich Common Poor |
42.3 ± 11.9 41.9 ± 10.6 44.4 ± 11.2 |
<0.001 |
Social support Strong Common Weak |
40.7 ± 10.0 41.7 ± 10.3 45.0 ± 11.9 |
<0.001 |
Grades First Second Third |
42.4 ± 10.5 42.9 ± 12.2 45.0 ± 10.6 |
<0.001 |
Father’s educational background University and higher High school Junior school and below |
43.0 ± 11.7 42.6 ± 10.7 44.3 ± 11.7 |
0.253 |
Mother’s educational background University and higher High school Junior school and below |
42.5 ± 12.5 42.7 ± 10.7 43.4 ± 10.8 |
0.552 |
Table 1 showing the differences SAS scores between groups. T-test was used to produce a p-value. The analysis shows that male students, junior students, students with poorer backgrounds and less social support get significantly higher scores. (Family economy: Rich = annual household income over 500,000 Yuan; Common = annual household income less than 500,000 Yuan but more than 200,000 Yuan; Poor = annual household income less than 200,000 Yuan.)
P-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant.