Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;8(9):e10487. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10487

Table 1.

The differences of SAS scores between groups.

Variate SAS Score P
Gender
 Male
 Female
44.2 ± 12.5
42.0 ± 10.1
<0.001
Only child
 Yes
 No
42.6 ± 11.8
42.8 ± 10.6
0.724
Poor student
 Yes
 No
43.7 ± 10.9
42.4 ± 11.1
0.024
Scholarship
 Ever got
 None
44.4 ± 12.6
42.5 ± 10.7
0.017
Academic performance
 Good
 Intermediate
Poor
41.7 ± 10.7
42.9 ± 10.7
43.9 ± 12.0
0.011
Origin of home
 Big city
 Middle city
 Small city
 Rural area
45.4 ± 13.1
41.9 ± 11.1
42.1 ± 10.9
42.9 ± 10.4
0.002
Family economy
 Rich
 Common
 Poor
42.3 ± 11.9
41.9 ± 10.6
44.4 ± 11.2
<0.001
Social support
 Strong
 Common
 Weak
40.7 ± 10.0
41.7 ± 10.3
45.0 ± 11.9
<0.001
 Grades
 First
 Second
 Third
42.4 ± 10.5
42.9 ± 12.2
45.0 ± 10.6
<0.001
Father’s educational background
 University and higher
 High school
 Junior school and below
43.0 ± 11.7
42.6 ± 10.7
44.3 ± 11.7
0.253
Mother’s educational background
 University and higher
 High school
 Junior school and below
42.5 ± 12.5
42.7 ± 10.7
43.4 ± 10.8
0.552

Table 1 showing the differences SAS scores between groups. T-test was used to produce a p-value. The analysis shows that male students, junior students, students with poorer backgrounds and less social support get significantly higher scores. (Family economy: Rich = annual household income over 500,000 Yuan; Common = annual household income less than 500,000 Yuan but more than 200,000 Yuan; Poor = annual household income less than 200,000 Yuan.)

P-value <0.05 were considered statistically significant.