Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Apr 8;101(7 Suppl 1):S40–S44. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001752

TABLE 2.

Survey 1 key questions and responses

Question 6: Does your program currently provide formal EBM education?
 Yes 71.4%
Question 7: In what format is EBM education provided?
 Didactic course 29.2%
 Didactic lectures (not part of an EBM course) 62.5%
 Tutorial group session 4.2%
 Research track for residents 25%
 Journal club 83.3%
 Webinar 0%
 Stand-alone workshop (2–3 days) 4.2%
 As part of clinical education 41.7%
 Other 12.5%
Question 11: Who is involved in providing EBM education?
 Basic science faculty 52.2%
 Physiatrist faculty 91.3%
 Librarian 26.1%
 Allied health faculty 21.7%
 Other 13%
Question 12: Is there an EBM lead/champion among PM&R faculty?
 Yes 41.7%
Question 13: What type of assessment exists for EBM education?
 Written examination 8.3%
 Oral examination 0%
 Objective structured clinical examination 0%
 No evaluation 75%
 Other 20.8%
Question 15: What barriers exist to the implementation of EBM curriculum in your program?
 0–4 (0: no barrier; 4: severe barrier); percentage of 3 and 4 scores
 Lack of faculty interest 42.1%
 Lack of resident interest 15.8%
 Lack of faculty who are knowledgeable about EBM 36.85%
 Lack of EBM training resources 21.1%
Question 16: How important do you believe the following objectives would be to include in an EBM curriculum?
 0–4 (0: not important; 4: very important); percentage of 3 and 4 scores
 Performing critical appraisal of literature 94.7%
 Searching for evidence 89.5%
 Posing a focused question 79%
 Applying existing evidence in clinical decision making 94.7%
 Understanding biostatistical principles common to rehabilitation research 61.1%
 Acquiring a more positive attitude toward EBM 66.7%
 Establish a habit of lifelong learning and using EBM in clinical practice 73.7%