Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 5;8:113. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00509-9

Table 1.

Reactive agility training program effects on psychological measures (Vienna test system)

LVT STROOP VISGED ZBA DT
Naming Reading
RT (sec) Correct (%) RT (sec) Incorrect (%) IF (sec) RT (sec) Incorrect (%) IF (sec) VMP (score) TA (sec) MDD (pixels) Correct (score) Incorrect (score) Omitted (score)
EXP * * * * *
BL 3.83 (1.31) 95.8 (5.8) 0.77 (0.17) 4.6 (2.6) 0.13 (0.09) 0.81 (0.16) 2.9 (1.9) 0.15 (0.09) 2.46 (1.05) 1.06 (0.49) 75.9 (35.0) 267.3 (32.9) 31.1 (15.3) 20.3 (6.1)
Post 3.19 (0.38) 100.0 (0.0) 0.68 (0.08) 2.2 (2.3) 0.10 (0.08) 0.72 (0.09) 1.5 (1.4) 0.13 (0.06) 3.04 (0.80) 1.17 (0.67) 72.2 (22.8) 288.8 (35.0) 23.5 (9.0) 15.5 (8.8)
CON * * *
BL 3.80 (0.58) 96.5 (4.2) 0.72 (0.10) 2.7 (1.8) 0.10 (0.06) 0.76 (0.08) 3.1 (2.4) 0.14 (0.05) 1.92 (1.90) 1.03 (0.48) 72.2 (19.8) 265.3 (48.1) 23.5 (12.8) 15.5 (7.9)
Post 3.80 (0.41) 97.3 (2.9) 0.76 (0.10) 3.3 (2.3) 0.13 (0.09) 0.83 (0.13) 3.3 (2.1) 0.21 (0.15) 1.84 (2.01) 1.11 (0.43) 72.4 (16.8) 259.7 (46.1) 26.3 (12.1) 17.2 (8.2)

Values are mean (SD) of each variables

BL, baseline; CON, control group; DT, determination test; EXP, experimental training group; IF, interference effect; LVT, visual pursuit test; MDD, median direction deviation; RT, median reaction time; STROOP, Stroop test; TA, time anticipation; VISGED, visual memory test; VMP, visual memory performance; ZBA, time/movement anticipation test

*p < 0.05 post hoc paired samples t test

Significant group × time interaction