Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug;11(8):1287–1300. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-333

Table 3. Details of port placement, incision, and chest tube.

Variables Before IPTW adjustment After IPTW adjustment
RATS (n=20) VATS (n=37) P value RATS (n=20) VATS (n=37) P value
No. of ports <0.001 <0.001
   1–3 2 (10.0) 33 (89.2) 12.2 92.5
   4–6 18 (90.0) 4 (10.8) 87.8 7.5
Assistant port 19 (95.0) 26 (70.3) 0.041 96.8 74.6 0.003
Mini-thoracotomy 7 (35.0) 35 (94.6) <0.001 31.9 93.6 <0.001
Max incision (mm) 12 (8 to 40) 35 (11 to 45) <0.001 12 (8 to 40) 35 (11 to 45) <0.001
Max port incision (mm) 12 (8 to 12) 15 (11 to 20) <0.001 12 (8 to 12) 15 (11 to 20) <0.001
No. of intercostal spaces <0.001 <0.001
   <4 6 (30.0) 34 (91.9) 26.8 92.5
   4–6 14 (70.0) 3 (8.1) 73.2 7.5
No. of chest tubes 1.000 0.504
   1 20 36 (97.3) 100.0 95.9
   2 0 1 (2.7) 0 4.1

Continuous data are presented as the median and interquartile range in brackets, and categorical data are presented as n (%) before IPTW adjustment, while as only % after IPTW adjustment. IPTW, inverse probability of treatment weighting; RATS, robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; VATS, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.