Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep;47(5):422–432. doi: 10.30476/IJMS.2021.90829.2180

Table 3.

Changes in anthropometric parameters after three months follow-up in the MIND diet group vs. the control group

Anthropometric parameters MIND group Control group Fα (1,35) Etaβ P value
Mean±SEM P value£ Mean±SEM P value
TBW (L) 1.71±0.68 0.02 1.30±0.44 0.011 0.21 0.006 0.64
PBF (%) -5.16±0.82 <0.001 -2.56±0.72 0.003 4.96 0.124 0.03
FFM (Kg) 2.54±0.52 <0.001 1.95±0.64 0.009 0.49 0.014 0.48
BMI (Kg/m2) -1.55±0.11 <0.001 -0.92±0.07 <0.001 16.86 0.325 <0.001
Weight (Kg) -3.98±-0.29 <0.001 -2.34±0.17 <0.001 18.21 0.342 <0.001
WC (cm) -3.54±0.56 <0.001 -1.46±0.49 0.011 6.74 0.162 0.01
HC (cm) -2.27±0.23 <0.001 -0.30±0.12 0.009 37.66 0.518 <0.001

The repeated measure ANOVA for group×time interaction for anthropometrics data after three months follow-up. MIND: Mediterranean-DASH intervention for neurodegenerative delay, TBW: Total body water; PBF: Percent of body fat; FFM: Fat-free mass; BMI: Body mass index; WC: Waist circumferences; HC: Hip circumferences; αF value (df1 for the numerator, df2 for the denominator); βPartial eta squared for the ratio of variance associated with an effect; P value for differences between groups; £P value for differences within groups.