Table 2.
Sample distribution in relation to eye-motor calibration parameters and school performance (n=88).
Variable | Learning impairment | n | Mean | Standard deviation | Significance (p) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
yes | 43 | 157,00 | 81,68 | ||
latency_D_1 | no | 45 | 147,31 | 90,25 | 0,531 |
yes | 43 | 160,35 | 50,32 | ||
velocity_D_1 | no | 45 | 151,13 | 50,42 | 0,460 |
yes | 43 | 85,35 | 23,86 | ||
accuracy_D_1 | no | 45 | 84,99 | 22,23 | 0,822 |
yes | 43 | 188,36 | 98,34 | ||
latency_E_1 | no | 45 | 169,52 | 85,17 | 0,438 |
yes | 43 | 143,84 | 51,52 | ||
velocity_E_1 | no | 45 | 151,05 | 53,64 | 0,515 |
yes | 43 | 87,18 | 17,95 | ||
accuracy_E_1 | no | 45 | 88,03 | 15,10 | 0,796 |
a≤0,05