Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 22;24(8):e37611. doi: 10.2196/37611

Table 12.

Estimated percentages of those who changed their responses on importance of values between 2 scenarios and, of those, the percentage that ranked the value to be more important in the first question than in the second question (C01 vs C02 or D01 vs D02), with associated 95% CIs and the P value for the test of equal cell proportionsa.

Domain and values Percentage of those who changed Percentage ranking the value as more important in C01 (vs C02) or D01 (vs D02) (95% CI) P valueb Design effect
Health—C01c vs C02d

Explanation 34.3 47.6 (42.8-52.4) .33 1.68

Speed 34.9 39.5 (35.2-44.1) <.001 1.52

Accuracy 25.1 49.5 (43.8-55.2) .86 1.68

Human contact 29.9 50.3 (45-55.5) .92 1.70

Responsibility 28.3 47.7 (42.5-53) .40 1.69

Reducing costs 33 59.2 (54.3-63.9) <.001 1.66

Fairness 29.3 53.7 (48.5-58.8) .16 1.66
Welfare—D01e vs D02f

Explanation 39.6 63.7 (59.4-67.7) <.001 1.55

Speed 32.7 41.8 (37-46.6) .001 1.66

Accuracy 26.4 48.4 (43.2-53.7) .56 1.57

Human contact 30.7 43.9 (39.1-48.8) .02 1.64

Personal tailoring 33.1 43.9 (39.1-48.8) .01 1.69

Reducing costs 35.1 58.8 (54.3-63.1) <.001 1.58

Fairness 27.1 51.7 (46.3-57.1) .53 1.70

aPercentages and CIs adjusted for weighting.

bAdjusted Pearson F test for equal proportions.

cC01: machine reads medical test, diagnoses, and recommends treatment.

dC02: machine triages when you are unwell.

eD01: machine processes application for unemployment benefits (data sharing required).

fD02: chatbot advises about carer payments.