Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 3;7(3):V. doi: 10.1177/23969873221099736

Table 2.

Prospective (observational) cohort studies evaluating rate of rupture of intracranial aneurysms across time.

Study Participants (n) Women (%) Proportion of patients not treated with aneurysm occlusion (%) Population Minimum and/or maximum aneurysm size (mm) Mean/median aneurysm size (diameter, mm) Rupture events Patient-years
Wiebers et al. 24 a 1692 75 42% (1692/4060) European and North American ≥2 b 7.4 ± 6.9 51 6544
Broderick et al. 23 113 66 North American, Australian, Austra-Asian ≥2 NA c 2 167
Sonobe et al. 22 374 64 84% (374/446) Japanese <5 3.3 ± 0.9 7 1306
Morita et al. 21 5720 68 63% (4195/6697) Japanese >3 5.7 ± 3.6 111 11,684
Güresir et al. 20 263 78 Germans <7 NA d 3 1500
Ishibashi et al. 19 603 71 Japanese ≥2 NA e 19 1406
Rinaldo et al. 16 214 66 North American 2–45 NA f 8 884
Murayama et al. 18 1556 68 87% (1960/2252) Japanese >2 3.4 ± 2.2 56 7368
Juvela et al. 17 142 54 Finnish 2–26 5.1 ± 3.7 34 3064
a

A small proportion of patients had an associated condition, such as arteriovenous malformation (2.0%) or polycystic kidney disease (1.6%).

b

85% of patients had aneurysms with size ≤12 mm.

c

Only five patients had an aneurysm ≥7 mm.

d

Mean diameter was 3.6 ± 1.7 mm in patients without aneurysm rupture during follow-up and 3 ± 1 mm in ruptured aneurysms.

e

74% of all aneurysms were small (<5 mm).

f

13.1% of all aneurysms within the size category of ≥10 mm.