Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 3;7(3):III–IV. doi: 10.1177/23969873221099715

Table 3.

GRADE evidence profile table for PICO 4.

Certainty assessment No. of patients Effect Certainty Importance
No. of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Angioplasty and/or stenting plus Best Medical Therapy (BMT) after initial mechanical thrombectomy BMT alone Relative (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days
3 Observational studies Serious a Serious b Serious c Serious d None 97/159 (61.0%) 88/200 (44.0%) OR 2.18 (1.37–3.46) 191 more per 1000 (from 78 more to 291 more) ⨁◯◯◯Very low CRITICAL
Good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days (sensitivity analysis: Baek et al. intervention group is rescue stenting + mechanical thrombectomy)
3 Observational studies Serious a Not serious Serious c Not serious None 54/108 (50.0%) 33/118 (28.0%) OR 2.43 (1.38–4.30) 206 more per 1000 (from 69 more to 346 more) ⨁◯◯◯Very low CRITICAL
Symptomatic ICH
3 Observational studies Serious a Not serious Serious c Serious e None 12/134 (9.0%) 20/118 (16.9%) OR 0.56 (0.26–1.22) 67 fewer per 1000 (from 119 fewer to 30 more) ⨁◯◯◯Very low CRITICAL
Mortality at 90 days
3 Observational studies Serious a Not serious Serious c Not serious None 26/134 (19.4%) 43/118 (36.4%) OR 0.52 (0.28–0.95) 135 fewer per 1000 (from 226 fewer to 12 fewer) ⨁◯◯◯Very low CRITICAL

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

a

Some or all included studies have a serious risk of bias as assessed with Robins-I.

b

Statistical heterogeneity.

c

Intervention/comparator dissimilarity.

d

Wide confidence interval.

e

Confidence interval unable to exclude substantial benefit or harm.