TABLE 4.
Summary of statistical analyses for experiment 1
| Experiment 1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| ANOVA 1.1: Factors: Condition (Full Bandwidth Acoustic vs. Full Bandwidth Acoustic and Electric), Song Segment | ||||
|
| ||||
| Factor | df Num | df Denom | F | p |
| Factor 1: Condition | 1 | 10 | 7.942 | 0.018 |
| Factor 2: Song Segment | 1 | 10 | 14.289 | 0.004 |
| Interaction | 1 | 10 | 14.289 | 0.004 |
| ANOVA 1.2: Factors: Condition (Electric Only vs. Anchor Only), Song Segment | ||||
|
| ||||
| Factor | df Num | df Denom | F | p |
|
| ||||
| Factor 1: Condition | 1 | 10 | 52.382 | <0.001 |
| Factor 2: Song Segment | 1 | 10 | 5.803 | 0.037 |
| Interaction | 1 | 10 | 5.803 | 0.037 |
| ANOVA 1.3: Factors: Condition (Acoustic vs. Acoustic and Electric), Song Segment, Low-Frequency Cutoff | ||||
|
| ||||
| Factor | df Num | df Denom | F | p |
|
| ||||
| Factor 1: Condition | 1 | 10 | 8.072 | 0.018 |
| Factor 2: Song Segment | 1 | 10 | 0.353 | 0.566 |
| Factor 3: Low-Frequency Cutoff | 3 | 30 | 136.752 | <0.001 |
| Condition × Song Segment | 1 | 10 | 8.813 | 0.014 |
| Song Segment × Low-Frequency Cutoff | 3 | 30 | 14.8 | <0.001 |
| Condition × Low-Frequency Cutoff | 3 | 30 | 0.815 | 0.496 |
| Three-way interaction | 3 | 30 | 0.242 | 0.866 |
| ANOVA 1.4: Factors: Condition (Acoustic and Full Bandwidth Electric vs. Acoustic and High-Pass Electric), Song Segment, Low-Frequency Cutoff | ||||
|
| ||||
| Factor | df Num | df Denom | F | p |
|
| ||||
| Factor 1: Condition | 1 | 10 | 0.374 | 0.553 |
| Factor 2: Song Segment | 1 | 10 | 0.94 | 0.355 |
| Factor 3: Low-Frequency Cutoff | 2 | 20 | 36.548 | <0.001 |
| Condition × Song Segment | 1 | 10 | 0.095 | 0.764 |
| Song Segment × Low-Frequency Cutoff | 2 | 20 | 10.679 | <0.001 |
| Condition × Low-Frequency Cutoff | 2 | 20 | 0.579 | 0.569 |
| Three-way interaction | 2 | 20 | 0.654 | 0.531 |
| Paired t Tests for “Ring of Fire” | ||||
|
| ||||
| Comparison | df | t | p | |
|
| ||||
| Electric only (2) vs. 250 Hz low pass (4) | 10 | −1.115 | 0.291 | |
| Electric only (2) vs. 500 Hz low pass (5) | 10 | 1.802 | 0.102 | |
| Electric only (2) vs. 1000 Hz low pass (6) | 10 | 6.909 | <0.001 | |
| Electric only (2) vs. full bandwidth (1) | 10 | 28.733 | <0.001 | |
| Paired t Tests for “Rhapsody in Blue” | ||||
|
| ||||
| Comparison | df | t | p | |
|
| ||||
| Electric only (2) vs. 250 Hz low pass (4) | 10 | 0.738 | 0.478 | |
| Electric only (2) vs. 500 Hz low pass (5) | 10 | 6.733 | <0.001 | |
| Electric only (2) vs. 1000 Hz low pass (6) | 10 | 15.173 | <0.001 | |
| Electric only (2) vs. full bandwidth (1) | 10 | 26.938 | <0.001 | |
ANOVA, analysis of variance; df, degrees of freedom.