Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;22:1689. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14102-y

Table 1.

Sample characteristics

Panel A: Household Characteristics (N = 36)
Median (IQR) or N(%)
Age of Household Respondent 41.5 (33.0, 56.0)
Household Respondent is Female 15 (41.7%)
Education Level of Household Respondent
 Less than primary 15 (41.7%)
 Primary education or more 21 (58.3%)
Main source of drinking water
 Piped/protected source 26 (72.2%)
 Unprotected source 10 (27.8%)
Owns more than one acre of land 16 (44.4%)
Household size 5.0 (4.0, 7.5)
Panel B: Individuals (N = 280)
N(%)
Female 151 (53.9%)
Adult 18 years or older: 110 (39.3%)
Among Adults 18 years or older:
 Education
  Less than a primary education 43 (39.1%)
  Primary education or more 67 (60.9%)
 Heard of RDTs 92 (87.6%)
 Previously had an RDT (among those who have heard of RDTs) 85 (94.4%)
 Beliefs about Malaria at Baseline
  Believe positive RDT very likely correct 82 (92.1%)
  Believe negative RDT very likely correct 55 (62.5%)
  Believe AL very effective in treating malaria 60 (60.0%)
 Reported malarial illness over study period 227 (84.7%)
 Number of study RDTs received
  0 56 (20.0%)
  1 41 (14.6%)
  2 27 (9.6%)
  3 or more 156 (55.7%)
Panel C: Monthly Surveys (N = 5617)
N (%)
Reported malaria illness in past month 909 (16.2%)
Had RDT for malaria illness 638 (70.2%)
Tested positive for malaria 337 (52.8%)
Adhered to positive test result 323 (95.8%)
Adhered to negative test result 182 (60.7%)

The household respondent provided information on treatment of malarial illnesses for children under the age of 18. Their beliefs about RDTs and AL were also used for children under the age of 18