Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 1;47(5):E311–E322. doi: 10.1503/jpn.220083

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Affective outcomes and reward feedback group effects for the striatum region of interest. Bar graphs depict percent signal change estimated marginal means (error bars depict ± 1 standard error) for significant group effects for the striatum during affective outcomes and reward feedback; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. Compared to healthy participants, participants with anxiety or depression showed increased activation of the striatum during affective outcomes, regardless of valence (p = 0.008, d = 0.31), and decreased activation of the striatum during reward feedback, regardless of reward presence (p = 0.046, d = −0.27).