Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 6;12:15103. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18879-1

Table 5.

Comparison of MCCBAM with other attention mechanisms.

Attention mechanism Grading Precision Recall F1-score Accuracy
SAM I 0.769 0.714 0.741 0.754
II 0.698 0.714 0.706
III 0.795 0.833 0.814
SENet I 0.696 0.929 0.796 0.762
II 0.806 0.595 0.685
III 0.821 0.762 0.790
SKNet I 0.878 0.857 0.867 0.833
II 0.761 0.833 0.795
III 0.872 0.810 0.840
Non_Local I 0.857 0.857 0.857 0.841
II 0.846 0.786 0.815
III 0,0.822 0.881 0.851
CBAM I 0.850 0.810 0.829 0.817
II 0.786 0.786 0.786
III 0.818 0.857 0.837
BAM I 0.923 0.857 0.889 0.833
II 0.767 0.786 0.776
III 0.818 0.857 0.837
MCCBAM I 0.902 0.881 0.892 0.873
II 0.850 0.810 0.829
III 0.867 0.929 0.897