Skip to main content
. 2015 Feb 7;81(2):177–183. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.01.004

Table 3.

Comparison of mean scores by sub-item of CDI (p-value, comparison of medians by Kruskal–Wallis test) of patients with nonsyndromic lip and palate cleft (case group) and control patients (n = 122).

Sub-item Cases Controls p
1 0.312 0.213 0.443
2 0.410 0.525 0.223
3 0.267 0.361 0.167
4 0.328 0.360 0.710
5 0.082 0.213 0.065
6 0.738 0.836 0.344
7 0.066 0.131 0.301
8 0.262 0.328 0.278
9 0.393 0.426 0.429
10 0.213 0.213 0.845
11 0.574 0.705 0.356
12 0.262 0.410 0.155
13 0.508 0.508 1.000
14 0.328 0.426 0.278
15 0.951 0.574 0.021a
16 0.148 0.344 0.052
17 0.426 0.492 0.735
18 0.328 0.230 0.671
19 0.820 0.951 0.393
20 0.328 0.262 0.519
21 0.312 0.312 0.656
22 0.295 0.262 0.802
23 0.312 0.377 0.958
24 0.508 0.787 0.044a
25 0.131 0.295 0.039a
26 0.377 0.180 0.094
27 0.164 0.098 0.519
a

p-value < 0.05.