Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 7;82(2):191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.03.014

Table 3.

Quantitative assessment of objective outcomes.

Data Groups
With satisfactory improvement Without satisfactory improvement Total t test p-value
With vs. without improvement
Patients, total n (%) 13 (81.3) 3 (18.7) 16 (100)



SNOT-22 pre Mean (SD) 47.7 (19.6) 61.0 (16.4) 50.2 (19.3) 0.31
SNOT-22 post Mean (SD) 25.3 (19.3) 48.0 (16.5) 29.6 (20.4) 0.13
Difference SNOT-22 Mean (SD) 22.4 (23.4) 13.0 (4.4) 20.6 (21.6) 0.19
Pre vs. post t test p-value 0.007a 0.39 0.006a



Lund–Kennedy pre Mean (SD) 8.5 (3.5) 10.3 (1.5) 8.8 (3.3) 0.19
Lund–Kennedy post Mean (SD) 4.2 (4.3) 9.3 (1.2) 5.1 (4.4) 0.002a
Difference Lund–Kennedy Mean (SD) 4.3 (4.0) 1.0 (1.0) 3.7 (3.8) 0.02a
Pre vs. post t test p-value 0.009a 0.42 0.01a

N, number; %, percentage; SD, standard deviation.

a

Statistical significance.