Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 24;16:933718. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.933718

Table 3.

Details of real-time fMRI neurofeedback studies with regulation target in the “motor subsystem.”

References ROI(s), regulation direction and definition Study population Control condition Feedback Regulation of target ROI(s)/online changes Offline analysis (whole brain) (Post-hoc) connectivity changes Behavioral/clinical changes
Megumi et al., 2015 Connectivity between M1 (left) and LP (left) ↑; % 12 healthy volunteers (21 controls (2 control groups)) Placebo control/control without feedback intervention (with fMRI) Intermittent (numerical) Yes, l. M1 → l. LP↑ (EG) - DMN (LP, PCC, MPFC) → MVN (M1, SMA, IPS, FEF) (EG) No observation
Yamashita et al., 2017 Connectivity between M1 (left) and LP (left) ↑; % 18 healthy volunteers (12 controls) Feedback based on opposite regulation direction Intermittent (scale) Yes, M1 → LP↑ (EG), M1 → LP↓(CG) - M1 → LP ~
Liew et al., 2016 Connectivity between M1 and ipsilesional thalamus ↑; # 4 chronic stroke patients (no controls) No control Continuous (scale) Yes, M1 → thalamus (3/4) - Perilesional M1 → ipsilesional thalamus No observation
Chiew et al., 2012 M1 (bilateral) ↑↓ (increase laterality); # 13 healthy volunteers (5 controls) Placebo control Continuous (scale) ~ Basal ganglia, thalamus, cortical motor regions, parietal cortex, premotor, SMA, r. AI, ACC ↑ (NFvs.Rest) - No observation
Berman et al., 2012 M1 (left) ↑; # 15 healthy volunteers (no controls) No control Continuous (scale) No Thalamus, SPL, IPS, anterior insula, IFG, MFG ↑ - No observation
Blefari et al., 2015 M1 (left) ↑; # 11 healthy volunteers (no controls) No control Continuous (scale) ~ SMA, PMA, putamen, caudate, IPL ↑; MTG, MFG, precuneus, insula, MOG ↓ - No behavioral improvement
Yoo et al., 2008 M1 (left) ↑; # 11 healthy volunteers (11 controls) Placebo control Continuous (curve) Yes, M1↑ (EG) Pre-/post-central gyrus, r. parahippocampal gyrus, MTG↑ (EG), Follow-up: hippocampus and the limbo-thalamo-cortical pathway↑ (EG) - No observation
Yang et al., 2021 M1 (left) or PMA (left ventral) ↑; % 15 + 15 healthy volunteers (no controls) *1 Other Continuous (scale) ~ No, l. M1 → (EG1); Yes, l. PMA↑ (EG2) r. precentral cortex, l. SMA, l. rolandic operculum, r. IPL↑ - No observation
Mehler et al., 2019 M1 and SMA (bilateral) ↑; # 17 healthy volunteers (no controls) Other Continuous (scale) ~ Yes, SMA↑, No, M1↓ - - No observation
Pereira et al., 2019 PMA (bilateral) interhemispheric connectivity ↑↓; # 10 healthy volunteers (no controls) Control without feedback intervention (with fMRI) Continuous (scale) Yes, PMA↑↓ PMA, SMA, IFG, lentiform nucleus, cerebellum↑ l. PMA → r. PMA No observation
Sitaram et al., 2012 PMA (left ventral) ↑; # 2 chronic stroke patients (4 healthy control volunteers) Other (HV) Continuous (scale) Yes, PMA↑ PMA, SMA, SMC, IFG, medial FC, occipital gyrus↑ - No clinical improvement
Marins et al., 2015 PMA (left) ↑; % 14 healthy volunteers (14 controls) Placebo control Continuous (scale) Yes, l. PMA↑ (EG) PMA, SFG, MFG, hippocampus, SMA, basal ganglia, cerebellum ↑ (EG) - No observation
Xie et al., 2015 PMA (right dorsal) ↑; # 12 healthy volunteers (12 controls) Placebo control Continuous (curve) - - l. PMA → r. PPL, r. PMA → r. PPL↑ No observation
Hui et al., 2014 PMA (right) ↑; # 12 healthy volunteers (12 controls) Placebo control Continuous (curve) Yes, PMA↑ (EG) SMA, l. M1/S1, PPL, cerebellum↑ r. PMA → l. PPL Behavioral improvement
Kober et al., 2019 Precentral gyrus (left lateral) ↑; # 11 healthy volunteers (no controls) No control Continuous (scale) Yes, l. precentral gyrus↑ Cerebellum, pre-/post-central regions, SMA, basal ganglia, visual brain regions ↑ - No observation
Mehler et al., 2020 SMA (bilateral) ↑; # 4 MCA stroke patients (no controls) No control Continuous (scale) ~ - - No observation
Papoutsi et al., 2018 SMA (bilateral) ↑; # 10 Huntington's disease patients (no controls) No control Continuous (scale) Yes, SMA↑ l. putamen ↑ SMA → l. putamen, SMA → cerebellum Clinical improvement
Sepulveda et al., 2016 SMA (bilateral) ↑; # 10 male healthy volunteers (10 controls) Other Continuous (scale) Yes, SMA↑ Precentral gyrus, insula, supramarginal gyrus↑ MFG → SFG, l. ACC → r. ACC, l. SMA → r. SMA, l. precentral gyrus → r. precentral gyrus, l. SMA → precentral gyrus No observation
Scharnowski et al., 2015 SMA (bilateral) and PHC (left) (Difference between the ROI) ↑↓; # 7 healthy volunteers (no controls) Feedback based on opposite regulation direction Continuous (scale) Yes, SMA/PHC↑↓ SMA, PHC, Middle cingulate, l. SPL, r. SFG, precuneus↑ No changes Behavioral improvement
Al-Wasity et al., 2021 SMA ↑; # 10 healthy volunteers (10 controls) Placebo control Continuous (scale) Yes, SMA ↑ (EG); SMA ↓ (CG) SMA, PMA, IPL, basal ganglia ↑ (EG); PMA, basal ganglia, middle frontal gyrus, r. IPL↑ (CG) - Behavioral improvement
Subramanian et al., 2011 SMA ↑; # 5 Parkinson's disease patients (5 controls) Placebo control Continuous (scale) Yes, SMA↑ (EG) SMA, PCG, STN, thalamus, GPi, insula, cerebellar vermis↑ - Clinical improvement (EG)
Subramanian et al., 2016 SMA ↑; # 13 Parkinson's disease patients (13 controls) Control without feedback intervention (without fMRI) Continuous (scale) Yes, SMA↑ (EG) Cerebellum, frontal areas, putamen, insula, subthalamic nucleus, ACC↑ - Clinical improvement (EG)
Hampson et al., 2011 SMA ↑↓; # 8 healthy volunteers (no controls) No control Continuous (curve) Yes, SMA↑↓ - SMA → striatum, thalamus No observation
Sukhodolsky et al., 2020 SMA ↑↓; # 21 Tourette's syndrome patients (no controls) Placebo control Continuous (curve) No, SMA → r. putamen, caudate, dorsal frontal cortex↑ (during Upregulation, EG) - Clinical improvement (EG)
Papoutsi et al., 2020 SMA or SMA and striatum (left) ↑; # 16 Huntington's disease patients (16 controls)*2 Placebo control Continuous (activity-based) Intermittent (FC-based) (scale) Yes, SMA ↑ (EG1); SMA → striatum↑ (EG2) - SMA → striatum (EG2) No clinical improvement
Auer et al., 2015 SMC (left and right) ↑; # 16 healthy volunteers (16 controls) Control without feedback intervention (without fMRI) Continuous (scale) Yes, SMC ↑ SMC ↑ (EG) - No observation
deCharms et al., 2004 SMC (left) ↑; # 6 healthy volunteers (3 controls) Placebo control Continuous (curve) Yes, SMC ↑ (EG) Cerebellum, occipital, frontal regions ↑ - No observation

The publications are sorted based on the region(s) of interest.

CG, control group; EG, experimental group; fMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging; HV, healthy volunteers; MCA, middle cerebral artery; NF, neurofeedback; ROI, region of interest; ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; AI, anterior insula; DMN, default mode network; FEF, frontal eye fields; IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; IPL, inferior parietal lobe; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; LP, lateral parietal cortex; M1, primary motor cortex; MFG, middle frontal gyrus; MOG, middle occipital gyrus; MPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; MTG, middle temporal gyrus; MVN, medial visual network; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; PHC, parahippocampal cortex; PMA, premotor area; PPL, posterior parietal lobe; S1, primary sensory area; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; SMA, supplementary motor area; SMC, somatomotor cortex; SPL, superior parietal lobe; d, dorsal; r, rostral; s, subgenual; v, ventral; l., left; r., right.

#

functional localizer; %, anatomical ROI; ↑, up-regulation; ↓, down-regulation; ↑↓, bidirectional regulation; (ROI1) → (ROI2), connectivity between two regions; -, no information; ~, mixed results.

*1

This study compared NF from two motor regions.

*2

This study had two experimental and two control groups.