Table 3.
Comparative analysis with unimodal and multimodal approaches
| Modality | Model | Accuracy(%) | Precision(%) | Recall(%) | F1-score(%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unimodal | Text | LSTM | 77.24 | 78.36 | 81.52 | 79.92 |
| Text | BiLSTM | 79.74 | 83.32 | 81.21 | 82.23 | |
| Text | BERT | 83.45 | 81.67 | 82.64 | 82.15 | |
| Graph | GCN | 86.42 | 87.34 | 85.57 | 86.44 | |
| Graph | GraphBERT | 87.36 | 86.56 | 87.79 | 87.19 | |
| Multimodal | Text+Graph | Doc2Vec+Node2Vec | 90.17 | 89.64 | 88.75 | 89.19 |
| Text+Graph | TFIDF+Doc2Vec+Node2Vec | 92.34 | 91.23 | 90.34 | 90.74 | |
| Text+Graph | Proposed | 95.24 | 94.67 | 92.34 | 93.48 |