Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 23;19(9):3085–3099. doi: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00124

Table 4. Nominal Individual UWL Thicknesses Calculated Using the Flux Plateau Methoda.

model drug receiver buffer stirring rate (rpm) particle size (nm) a UWL thickness (μm)
donor UWL for the free drug (hfUWLd) receiver UWL for the free drug (hfUWLr) donor UWL for particles (hpUWLd)
atazanavir no BSA 150b 460 NA NA NA NA
300 460 0.80 1471.7 365.8 4.8
500 460 0.78 994.7 282.1 3.7
1000 460 0.81 999.0 240.3 4.4
3% BSA in receiver 150 460 0.72 892.6 339.6 9.0
300 460 0.73 562.1 209.0 5.9
300 193 0.74 524.6 187.2 6.5
clotrimazole 3% BSA in receiver 150 276 0.97 1937.6 54.7 7.5
lopinavir 3% BSA in receiver 300 254 0.74 1132.3 165.4 23.8
300 454 NA 1132.3c 165.4c 19.8d
300 839 NA 1132.3c 165.4c 13.5d
a

Here, p and f describe drug in the particle and free drug form; d and r denote donor and receiver, respectively; a is the UWL asymmetry coefficient; and hUWL is the UWL thickness. NA: not applicable.

b

Flux plateau not clear due to the low diffusional flux and high experimental error.

c

hfUWL was assumed to remain the same as the LPV 254 nm system since the same stirring rate was used.

d

hpUWLd was calculated using eq 1 using the LPV 254 nm system as a reference.