Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 12;10:966813. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.966813

Table 3.

Comparison of the performances of the four different modelsa.

STDs Model Modeling performance Predicting performance
MAE RMSE MAPE (%) MAE RMSE MAPE (%)
AIDS ARIMA 0.04/0.05 0.05/0.03 12.00/11.87 0.08/0.05 0.09/0.05 23.26/12.86
ERNN 0.04/0.04 0.05/0.05 12.36/14.42 0.07/0.09 0.08/0.11 20.24//23.54
ARIMA-ERNN 0.03/0.03 0.04/0.04 11.00/9.72 0.06/0.06 0.08/0.07 18.34/14.74
LSTM 0.07/0.03 0.09/0.04 23.39/11.00 0.06/0.08 0.07/0.11 18.63/25.43
Gonorrhea ARIMA 0.04/0.04 0.06/0.03 7.25/5.08 0.14/0.13 0.19/0.10 19.44/17.07
ERNN 0.05/0.05 0.07/0.06 8.50/8.23 0.14/0.12 0.19/0.14 18.03/17.95
ARIMA-ERNN 0.04/0.03 0.06/0.04 6.75/4.98 0.13/0.10 0.17/0.13 17.77/16.46
LSTM 0.01/0.33 0.02/0.06 1.38/5.95 0.04/0.09 0.05/0.12 5.09/15.13
Syphilis ARIMA 0.16/0.18 0.25/0.14 6.15/5.40 0.29/0.78 0.39/0.71 9.80/21.88
ERNN 0.18/0.26 0.25/0.30 6.775/9.744 0.30/0.78 0.13/0.87 9.55/24.00
ARIMA-ERNN 0.16/0.12 0.24/0.16 6.079/4.605 0.26/0.66 0.35/0.72 8.67/20.18
LSTM 0.23/0.21 0.12/0.31 8.571/8.932 0.17/0.35 0.25/0.44 5.79/11.20

aOne-year forecast performance/5-year forecast performance.