Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 7;2022(9):CD001704. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001704.pub5

3. Assessment of items relating to applicability of trial findings.

  Clearly defined study population? Interventions sufficiently described? Main outcomes sufficientlydescribed? Appropriate timing of outcome measurement?
(Yes ≥ 6 months) Assessment of compliance with interventions
Baker 1991 Yes Partial: frequency and intensity of gait retraining not described Yes No: only followed up until discharge: mean stay in rehabilitation hospital for intervention group was 54 days. No: although mention of treadmill participants aiming to exceed previous performance on the treadmill
Binder 2004 Yes Yes Yes Partial: although 6 months follow‐up, it was only until the end of the intervention. Yes: in both groups
Bischoff‐Ferrari 2010 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Braid 2008 Yes Partial: usual post‐discharge
physiotherapy not described Yes Partial: 14 weeks. Intervention ended after 6 weeks. Partial: compliance and tolerance to electrical stimulation only reported for intervention group
Gorodetskyi 2007 Yes Yes Yes (although limited) No: 10 days marking end of treatment. Yes: it is stated that intervention was received by all participants
Graham 1968 Partial: inadequate description; excluded post‐randomisation if unsuitable to walk at 2 weeks Partial: little description of rehabilitation Partial: no record of mobility outcomes Yes: 1 year No
Hauer 2002 Yes Yes Partial: however, clarification on some outcome measures was obtained via contact with trial author Yes: 6 months (3 months after the end of the intervention). Two year follow‐up results reported for whole study population Yes: in both groups
Karumo 1977 Partial: no mention of exclusion criteria. Though the inclusion criteria were a displaced femoral neck fracture, the implants used for some participants (9 Jewett nails, 1 Rush nail, 1 Kuntscher nail) suggest that some extracapsular fractures were included. Yes Partial: incomplete descriptions No: 9 weeks only for function (3 months for mortality) No
Kimmel 2016 Yes Yes Yes No: length of follow‐up is Day 5 or discharge if discharged before Day 5 No
Kronborg 2017 Yes Yes Yes No: 10 days or discharge if sooner Yes: in both groups
Lamb 2002 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 13 weeks from surgery. Yes: “All of the women used their stimulators for more than 75% of the cumulative time requested”
Langford 2015 Yes Yes Yes Partial No
Latham 2014 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 9 months Yes: compliance with interventions assessed: "adherence was 98%”
Lauridsen 2002 Yes Yes Yes No: primary outcome = length of training period; otherwise until discharge Yes: in terms of the interventions (although not the components)
Magaziner 2019 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 40 weeks Yes
Mangione 2005 Yes Yes Yes No: 12 weeks for the two intervention groups but 8 weeks only for the control group. Partial: only compliance of the intervention groups recorded
Mangione 2010 Yes Yes Yes Partial: majority followed up for 16 weeks Yes
Miller 2006 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 12 weeks only for mobility outcomes. One year follow‐up data for mortality, re‐admissions and admission to higher level of care Partial: only compliance of the intervention groups recorded
Mitchell 2001 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 16 weeks follow‐up. Intervention ended at 6 weeks Partial: only compliance with intervention recorded
Monticone 2018 Yes Partial: dosage about open kinetic chain exercises in the control group not described Yes Partial Yes: “Physiotherapists’ systematic checking of the exercise
administration manual revealed excellent compliance
rates in both groups".
Moseley 2009 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 16 weeks follow‐up. Yes: “Participants completed exercise diaries which were analysed to ascertain adherence to the programmes.”
Care provider visits also documented
Oh 2020
  Yes Yes Yes Partial: 6 months follow‐up (5 months after the end of intervention) No
Ohoka 2015 Yes No: standard physical therapy not described. Intensity of treadmill training not described Yes Partial: average of approximately 6 months No
Oldmeadow 2006 Yes Yes Yes No: only until acute hospital discharge. Mobility outcomes at 7 days Yes: time to first walk recorded in both groups
Orwig 2011 Yes Yes Yes Yes. Outcomes were assessed at 2, 6, and 12 months after hip fracture Yes. Hours spent exercising quantified
Pol 2019 Yes Yes Yes Partial Yes
Resnick 2007 Yes Yes Yes No: although follow‐up was 12 months from fracture, this coincided with the end of treatment Partial: no data for usual care group
Salpakoski 2015 Yes Partial: control standard care did not have specific dosage for the exercise “5‐7 exercises for the lower limbs” Yes Partial Partial: only compliance in intervention group reported but reported “None of the participants were followed
for compliance” in control
Sherrington 1997 Yes Partial: "Usual care" not described Yes No: final assessment at 1 month (27 to 43 days) Partial: only the intervention group completed diaries and were asked about the specific exercises. However, all participants were asked about general exercise.
Sherrington 2003 Yes Yes Yes No: 2 weeks follow‐up only Partial: some data available but not regarding weight bearing
Sherrington 2004 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 4 months follow‐up only Partial: compliance data collected for the two exercise groups but not for the control group.
Sherrington 2020 Yes Yes Yes Yes: 12 months Partial: compliance data collected for intervention group via diaries
Stasi 2019 Yes Yes No Partial: 6 months No
Suwanpasu 2014 No No Unclear No: 6 weeks after discharge No
Sylliaas 2011 Yes Yes Yes No: intervention is only 12 weeks following an observation period of 12 weeks No: not assessed
Sylliaas 2012 Yes Yes Yes Partial: although is 36 weeks after fracture, trial 1 starts 12 weeks after fracture, final follow‐up is 24 weeks after start of 2011 intervention No: not assessed
Taraldsen 2019 Yes Yes Yes Yes: T3 = 48 to 56 weeks Yes
Tsauo 2005 Yes Yes Yes Yes: 6 months' follow‐up. No. However, 4 participants in the intervention group were excluded because of poor compliance.
Van Ooijen 2016 Yes Yes Yes Partial: 12 months' follow‐up for some but not all outcomes No, included in protocol bot not reported
Williams 2016 Yes Yes Yes No: 3 months No