Suwanpasu 2014.

Study characteristics
Methods	Randomised controlled trial
Participants	King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand Period of study: January 2012 to February 2013 46 participants Inclusion: 60 to 93 years of age, diagnosed with femoral neck fracture, intertrochanteric fracture or subtrochanteric fracture Exclusion: nil Age: mean (SD) 75.2 (8.4) % male: 34 Number lost to follow‐up:
Interventions	1. Intervention: physical activity‐enhancing programme, based on Resnick's self‐efficacy model (Resnick 2009). Four phases of physical training and efficacy‐based intervention, covering 5 sessions. Phases: assessment, preparation, practicing and evaluation. Face‐to‐face contact and 5 telephone calls during 7 weeks post‐surgery. 2. Control: standard care (physical activity for hip fracture booklet)
Outcomes	6 weeks after discharge International Physical Activity Questionnaire
Notes	Contributed no outcomes to this review Funding: Thai Red Cross Society and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital Conflict of interest: nil
Risk of bias
Bias	Authors' judgement	Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias)	Low risk	Quote: "We used a simple block randomization technique with a coin flip to assign subjects"
Allocation concealment (selection bias)	Unclear risk	Allocation concealment not specified
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes	Unclear risk	Therapists conducting the intervention and participants were not blinded to the group assignment. Impact of non‐blinding is unclear
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Observer‐reported outcomes, some judgement	High risk	Blinding not specified; outcome was self‐reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Observer‐reported outcomes, some judgement	Low risk	Less than 20% of data missing
Selective reporting (reporting bias)	Unclear risk	No protocol or trial registry. Only 1 outcome reported in methods and results
Free from baseline imbalance bias?	Unclear risk	Trend toward intervention group being older and having greater physical activity at baseline (between group difference, P = 0.06 for both). Few functional or health characteristics at baseline reported (mental test and physical activity only)
Free from performance bias due to non‐trial interventions?	High risk	Social contact in intervention arm likely to confound any effect. An appropriate comparator would have been social home visits but no physical intervention.