Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 7.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Mar 5;161(2):347–352. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.02.017

Table 3.

Unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for associations between treatment and lymph node detection methods and RFS. NAT/VBT no adjuvant therapy/vaginal brachytherapy; LND lymph node dissection; RP retroperitoneal

Recurrence (%) Vaginal RP Distant HR (95%CI)
Treatment
NAT/VBT (n=76) 5 (6.6) 1 2 2 1.00
EBRT (n=21) 1 (4.8) 1 1 0.56 (0.13, 2.36)
Chemo +/− RT (n=78) 3 (3.9) 2 0.68 (0.08, 5.87)

SLN Dissection
SLN only (n=90) 5 (5.6) 1 2 2 1.00
SLN + pelvic LND (n=38) 2 (5.3) 0 0 2 0.72 (0.14, 3.72)
SLN+ pelvic +aortic LND (n=47) 2 (4.3) 0 1 1 0.84 (0.16, 4.34)

ITC Detection
H&E (n=85) 6 (7.1) 1 2 3 1.00
IHC (n=89) 3 (3.4) 0 2 1 0.48 (0.12, 1.93)