Table 2.
Persons With MCI Who Participated in the Advisory Panel or MCI ENACT Intervention Prototypesa
| Advisory panel, n (%) (n = 6 individuals with MCI) | MCI ENACT prototypes, n (%) (n = 13 individuals with MCI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Participant characteristic | M (SD) | N | % | M (SD) | N | % |
| Age | 76.2 (6.6) | 78.7 (5.8) | ||||
| Gender | ||||||
| Female | 3 | 50% | 2 | 23% | ||
| Race/ethnic backgrounds | ||||||
| African American | 0 | 0% | 1 | 8% | ||
| White | 6 | 100% | 10 | 76% | ||
| Hispanic | 0 | 0% | 1 | 8% | ||
| Other | 0 | 0% | 1 | 8% | ||
| Education | ||||||
| High school graduate | 0 | 0% | 3 | 23% | ||
| Some college | 0 | 0% | 1 | 8% | ||
| College graduate | 1 | 17% | 2 | 15% | ||
| Any postgraduate | 5 | 83% | 7 | 54% | ||
| Relationship status | ||||||
| Married/with partner | 6 | 100% | 10 | 77% | ||
| Widowed | 0 | 0% | 1 | 8% | ||
| Divorced/separated | 0 | 0% | 2 | 15% | ||
| Self-rated health | ||||||
| Excellent | 5 | 83% | 8 | 62% | ||
| Good | 1 | 17% | 3 | 23% | ||
| Fair | 0 | 0% | 2 | 15% | ||
| Family care partners’ relationship to a person with MCI | ||||||
| Spouse | 4 | 67% | 9 | 69% | ||
| Partner | 1 | 17% | 1 | 8% | ||
| Child | 1 | 17% | 3 | 23% |
Note: MCI = mild cognitive impairment; ENACT = ENgaging in Advance Care planning Talks.
aDemographic information was not collected for family care partners. Data include one individual with MCI who participated in both the advisory panel and an MCI ENACT prototype.