Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 8;14(8):e27784. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27784

Table 5. Simulation participant survey results.

Median response from Likert scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neutral; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree.

Question Median (n) Range
How likely are you to recommend this session to a colleague? 5 (41) 3-5
Following the simulation, I feel comfortable with bedside management of epistaxis including nasal compression, topical medications, and nasal tamponade 4 (41) 3-5
Following the simulation, I understand the need to consult otolaryngology early in uncontrolled epistaxis 5 (30) 4-5
Following the simulation, I have a better understanding of when and how to initiate the massive transfusion protocol 5 (41) 2-5
Following the simulation, I understand how to approach continued bleeding in the setting of underlying liver disease and the need for thoughtful fluid resuscitation 5 (35) 4-5
Following this simulation, I feel comfortable managing a bloody oropharynx, including types of suction, intubation equipment, and when to activate a difficult airway team 4 (30) 4-5
Following this simulation, I have a better understanding of when to consider intubation to protect the airway in case of nasopharyngeal or oral bleeding if the Glasgow Coma Scale score is normal 4 (11) 3-5
The debrief promoted reflection and team discussion 5 (41) 4-5