Table 5. Simulation participant survey results.
Median response from Likert scale: 1 = strongly disagree; 2 = disagree; 3 = neutral; 4 = agree; 5 = strongly agree.
Question | Median (n) | Range |
How likely are you to recommend this session to a colleague? | 5 (41) | 3-5 |
Following the simulation, I feel comfortable with bedside management of epistaxis including nasal compression, topical medications, and nasal tamponade | 4 (41) | 3-5 |
Following the simulation, I understand the need to consult otolaryngology early in uncontrolled epistaxis | 5 (30) | 4-5 |
Following the simulation, I have a better understanding of when and how to initiate the massive transfusion protocol | 5 (41) | 2-5 |
Following the simulation, I understand how to approach continued bleeding in the setting of underlying liver disease and the need for thoughtful fluid resuscitation | 5 (35) | 4-5 |
Following this simulation, I feel comfortable managing a bloody oropharynx, including types of suction, intubation equipment, and when to activate a difficult airway team | 4 (30) | 4-5 |
Following this simulation, I have a better understanding of when to consider intubation to protect the airway in case of nasopharyngeal or oral bleeding if the Glasgow Coma Scale score is normal | 4 (11) | 3-5 |
The debrief promoted reflection and team discussion | 5 (41) | 4-5 |