Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 7;8(36):eabp9471. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abp9471

Fig. 1. Binding a single PI(4,5)P2 lipid does not target tubbyCT stably to a model membrane.

Fig. 1.

(A) CG system setup of tubbyCT (red) with one PI(4,5)P2 lipid (violet) in the binding pocket known from the crystal structure (cyan residues). The PI(4,5)P2 is embedded in a POPC bilayer (yellow); water and ions are shown as transparent surface. (B and C) Distance between the tubbyCT/PLCδ1-PH domain binding pocket and the phosphate layer (PO4 beads) of the binding leaflet containing a single PI(4,5)P2. Ten unbiased simulations of 1 μs [tubbyCT (B)] and seven unbiased simulations of 2 μs [PLCδ1-PH (C)] are shown, respectively. (D and E) Distance between the tubbyCT/PLCδ1-PH domain binding pocket and the phosphate layer (PO4 beads) of the binding leaflet containing 5 mol % of PI(4,5)P2. Three unbiased simulations of 5 μs each are shown. (F) Potential of mean force (PMF) for the PI(4,5)P2 binding of tubbyCT (red) and PLCδ1-PH domain (blue). (G) Control simulations of tubbyCT bound to one PI(4,5)P2 lipid embedded in a POPC membrane containing 5 mol % of POPS (PS) (green; 3 × 1 μs) and POPG (PG) (orange; 3 × 1 μs) lipids, respectively. (H) Control simulations of tubbyCT bound to one PI(4,5)P2 lipid embedded in a POPC membrane containing 5 mol % of PI(4)P (3 × 5 μs).